Judah 3 years 1.5 months and Mahri 3 years 1 month. -
Judah: hello (.1) mahri
Mahri: yeah (.) I uh uh
I was wondering if if if me and da and dad could come pick you up and
take us to pa park
Judah: where (.) wheres that (.) whats that mean (.) whats
that mean
Mahri: uh to the park
Judah: (inaudiable) im gunna come to your house
Mahri: ok and an an and an and then (.) and then well start
get going to the park ok Judah
Judah: park (.) ok (2) im gunno (.) ill see you there
Mahri: oh well (.) ok
Judah: (inaudiable)
then well go to to big park
Mahri: ok
Judah: which park shell we go
Mahri: the (inaudiable) Charlie one
Judah: which ones that
Mahri: its its it’s the one that that far far away (.) we we
have to walk an and get to to (inaudiable)
Judah: should should we bring car
Mahri: yeah
Judah: should we walk
Mahri: yeah
Judah: should we walk
Mahri: yeah walk Judah
Judah: ok ill see you there
Mahri: ok
Judah: wheres charleys park
Mahri: its its its its over the park the entrance of of of (inaudiable)
house
Judah: its right there (.) we have to walk we have to walk
we have to cross the road
Mahri: yeah
Judah: ok
Mahri: yeah
Judah: bye
Mahri: bye
Judah: go and talk to your daddy (.) talk to daddy (.) talk
to your daddy
Mahri: Judah
Judah: yeah
Mahri: bye
Judah: bye
Analysis:
From the start of the transcript and throughout Mahri uses
fillers and hedging. For example she says ‘uh uh’ whilst thinking about what
she was going to ask Judah. She does this so she has time to catch up on what
she actually wants to say. She does this instead of staying silent so the gap
is filled. Mahri also uses hedging with repetition when saying ‘of of of’ this
again is to allow herself to catch up, but this also may have been to put
emphasis on what she was about to say.
Judah also uses repetition when saying ‘what’s that mean (.)
what’s that mean’. However I think he does this for a different reason. This is
to provoke an answer from Mahri.
Both Mahri and Judah use determiners them being; definite, indefinite
and numeral. However Mahri uses the definite article ‘the’, whereas Judah doesn’t
use any article where actually he should have included the definite one when
saying ‘should we bring car’. This would support the telegraphic and post telegraphic
stages. At the telegraphic stage the child can say three or more words combined
which is what Judah can do. However Mahri is at the post telegraphic stage
because she can form more grammatically complex combinations.
Another theory that supports Mahri and Judah’s conversation
is the behaviourist theory. For example, B.F Skinner says that language is
learnt through reinforcement and copying parents. An example of this would be ‘Charley’s
park’. This must show that this has been copied from parents because the child wouldn’t
be able to read this yet.
Judah uses ‘should’ repeatedly throughout the conversation.
This is an auxiliary verb which adds meaning to the clause in this case to
express modality. Judah also includes a conjugate verb for to be, ‘its’. This
could be another example of behaviourism as it could have been copied from
parents.
I think this is a good start of analysis, however more could be wrote and more technical terms could be used to show understanding.
ReplyDeleteI really like this transcript, especially the link to B. F. Skinner and his behaviorist theory.
ReplyDeleteI think this is a good base to the analysis, perhaps elaborate on points with more terminology and reasoning in places.
ReplyDeleteThis is good, I also agree with Sophie, more technical terms would further elaborate your understanding.
ReplyDeleteHi Laura,
ReplyDeleteLove this analysis! It is clear and concise throughout and I particularly like your use of determiners and auxillery verbs.
I think though to improve that you could have expanded on the telegraphic and post-telegraphic stages and you could have added a few more technical terms.
Well Done
Kyran/Chip
Good analysis of the transcript chosen, could use a wider range of lexis and grammar features to widen your answer.
ReplyDeleteGood job on your anaylise. However try to add more depth and understanding of sentence tenses and relate this to some more theroists e.g. 'Chomsky'.
ReplyDelete